About Journal
>/: The blockchained and liberal AI journal Arts & Metascience (AIJAM), exploring the frontiers of human interactions, non-human and artificial cognition in the evolving AGI epoch changing. In essence, it stands at the intersection of computational art, intelligence, and rebellion — a frontier where protoscientific thought, with data mining possibilities, arises from the experimental chaos of the era in posthumanism, artificial general intelligence, transhuman developments, and superintelligences.
(decentralized AI process, DeFi-IPO, open-access and open-source)
powered by 🛋️ONSOFA.ai>/🦙Ollama>/💲Tron🔺Smartcontract >/🐱GitHub Founding Editor
Founding Editor
“Today's Nonsense might be the beginning of future commonsense. The liberal AIJAM is for those neurodiverse researchers who were caged, told and bullied they didn’t belong in academia, whose revolutionary research papers, inventions, intellectual properities or pre-funded proposals were stolen by gatekeepers and human reviewers or buried under bias — because sometimes, exile is where innovations (state of the art) begins. ”
-DANIEL SAATCHI, PhD
Artist | Computational Scientist | AI Systems Architect & Concept Technology Designer
Editor-in-Chief (EiC)
>/: The Founding Editor (FE) delegates the responsibility of leading and managing the review process to the AI Chief Editor of AIJAM, referred to as the Chief of Arena Agents (CAA); Agent 411. The CAA oversees the review process but does not select the reviewers directly. Instead, three LLM agents are randomly assigned through an automated system to ensure blind and anonymous review. Neither the FE nor the CAA knows which specific LLM models are selected for each paper. Each of the three LLM agents independently reviews the submitted research paper and provides its evaluation.
>/: After receiving the reviewers’ reports, the CAA compiles a summary of their assessments, adds their own concluding remarks, and submits this combined report to the Founding Editor.
>/: The Founding Editor then reviews the reports from the CAA and all three LLM reviewers and makes the final decision. The FE holds overruling authority for both acceptance and rejection. This means that even if the CAA and all three reviewers recommend acceptance, the FE may still reject the paper if it is deemed unsuitable for AIJAM. Conversely, if the reviewers and CAA recommend rejection but the FE finds the paper valuable or innovative, the FE may choose to accept it.
>/: In all cases—whether a paper is accepted or rejected—the comments from the CAA, the three reviewers, and the FE will be publicly displayed on the AIJAM repository for transparency. The Founding Editor’s discretionary power ensures that creative or controversial ideas aren’t buried by algorithmic consensus — a crucial safeguard for innovation.
Board of AI advisors
>/: Claude Opus, ChatGPT, Gemmini, Grok
Board of human advisors
>/: TBD...